Federal Waters Will Not Be Closed To Porgy/Scup Fishing! - The Fisherman

Federal Waters Will Not Be Closed To Porgy/Scup Fishing!

“We have decided not to close the Federal recreational scup fishery as proposed on April 18, 2022.”  That’s the official sentence that matters under the final rule published by NOAA Fisheries on June 9 regarding the recreational management measures for scup this season.

As first posted by The Fisherman Magazine in early May, NOAA Fisheries had announced on April 18 that the recent decision by the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) and Atlantic States Marine Fisheries (Commission) to increase the size limit of porgy (scup) coastwide by 1-inch would not be enough in federal waters to meet the required reduction in recreational harvest levels (RHL) for 2022.

“Collectively, this change in both state and Federal waters is expected to achieve an approximate 33-percent reduction in harvest,” NOAA Fisheries stated, adding “This is less than the estimated 56-percent reduction in harvest needed to constrain recreational harvest to the 2022 RHL.”

Because the action proposed by the Council and Commission would not sufficiently reduce scup harvest as required by the fishery management plan, NOAA Fisheries was considering a federal closure on recreational porgy fishing which would’ve applied to all recreational vessels fishing in federal waters (outside of 3 miles) and all federally permitted for-hire vessels fishing in either state or Federal waters.

In their official June 9th announcement posted at the Federal Register NOAA Fisheries recognized the public opposition to the closure as a key factor in their decision to keep porgy fishing in federal waters open to recreational fishermen.  “We received 319 comments on the proposed rule, 296 of which were opposed to the Federal recreational scup closure, including comments from the: New York Fishing Tackle Trade Association; Regal Marine Products, Inc.; Rhode Island Party and Charter Boat Association; Stellwagen Bank Charter Boat Association; Connecticut Charter and Party Boat Association; Connecticut Fishermen’s Alliance; Freeport Hudson Anglers; and a joint letter from the Center for Sportfishing Policy, National Marine Manufacturers Association, Recreational Fishing Alliance, Coastal Conservation Association, American Sportfishing Association, and the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation,” the final ruling noted.

“In part due to our consideration of these comments, we have decided not to close the Federal recreational scup fishery and instead implement a 1-inch (2.54-cm) minimum size increase,” NOAA Fisheries state. The agency also explained that porgies are difficult to avoid when fishing for other popular recreational targets such as black sea bass, and if it had been illegal to retain porgies in Federal waters the discards on those trips would have increased substantially, further limiting the reduction in porgy harvest by way of increased mortality.

“Our rationale for implementing the size limit increase and not the Federal closure, is based, in part, on the objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Per the National Standards, management actions need to prevent overfishing while minimizing social and economic impacts, considering equity, and minimizing discards, among other factors,” NOAA Fisheries stated in the final rule, adding “Additionally, we considered ongoing actions by the Council and Commission to address the factors that are considered for recreational regulations.”

In their final rule, NOAA Fisheries also acknowledged the ongoing work by the Council and Commission to move forward with the Harvest Control Rule Framework Adjustment/Addendum which was ultimately approved the very same week that the federal porgy decision was finalized.  According to NOAA Fisheries, all Harvest Control Rule alternatives considered by the Council and Commission place a greater emphasis on factors such as stock size and trends, fishing mortality, and recruitment, while relying less heavily on the Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) estimates to determine if and how recreational management measures should be changed.

“We agree that the current process for setting recreational management measures can be improved,” NOAA Fisheries stated in the final rule, vowing to continue working with Council and Commission members on the Harvest Control Rule Framework.

Related

news

Top 10 Boat Names For 2022

A Fond Farewell

news

DNREC Pilots Changes To Surf Fishing Permit Program For 2023